Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /usr/home/web/users/a0028728/html/blog/wp-includes/functions-formatting.php on line 83
Obviously, there are many components contributing to a global resurgence of irrational perspectives, superstition, religious sentiment, and faith. From my own observations, however, I have come across an important element I haven’t seen mentioned so far: It’s called progress.
When I grew up as a teenager in Bavaria, Southern Germany, we lived through boom years and relative affluence. We had a house, cars, TV, holidays and so on. Little has changed in the sense that products today have really different purposes compared to then.
However, there is one big difference. The feeling has changed. As a kid, I repaired my bicycle. As a teenager, I fixed my radio; I built Hi-Fi systems and even tuned my car. Products often came from factories nearby.
These days I can hardly do similar things. Technology, in the name of progress and cost, has run amok, leading away from us at a fast pace. Electronic elements that steer your car, your washing machine are unique parts only the specialized workshop can replace and tune-up. The Hi-Fi set, arguably cheaper than in the old days, has become a completely incomprehensible set of irreparable technology. It’s all Chinese junk full of toxic metals that will end up in landfills soon, and poison aquifers. Does complex technology benefit the customer? It might, because it’s cheaper (thanks to slave work conditions), compared to what it used to be, in real terms. Does it fit the general public? Here my answer is a clear: No.
Progress has not only empowered people; it has also disenfranchised the customers. We clearly have gone too far! We have become a hopeless bunch surrounded by technology we are not able to master any longer.
Consequences of this finding are far from trivial. If me, the fairly well educated technical professional feels outwitted by progress, how would people with a lesser level of education feel and react? How do today’s teenagers fare, when they leave school? Where are the car mechanics jobs today? I was told that the new versions of Mercedes and Lexus cars are shunned by the wealthy African elites. Why? Simply because there isn’t anyone out there, who knows how to repair these vehicles, once they fall prey to the glory of African roads, and maintenance culture. Progress has run away from us in such ways, that playing catch-up has become an almost impossible task. Customers aren’t controlling the products that shape their lives any longer.
Feeling disenfranchised and disoriented people tend to turn to conservative religious or other emotionally-based value systems. It’s like the drowning swimmer who tries to grab whatever floats around. Regardless of being right or wrong, religious systems are beyond reasoning and hence give the illusion of comfort. What cannot be argued about must be right, ok? Unfortunately, however, this is leading people away from the real issues that we face in this world today – overpopulation, habitat destruction, climate change, drinking water shortage. People are lulled into systems of beliefs that feel emotionally comfortable but don’t offer any help for the problems of our overcrowded, polluted and freaking-out planet.
In a nutshell, the general public needs to reclaim its rights for the products it deals with.
There are a number of things that can be done. The ball is in the court of the lawmakers, but little is done given it doesn’t fit anyone’s special interest. In particular, there are three points that come to my mind:
1. Simplicity. Bills need to be written that spell out the degree of technology that should be applied in respect of certain commodities and appliances. Some products should use proven and simple technology, without shunning, however innovation and, yes, progress.
2. Green technology. An emphasis should be put on green technology, too. It doesn’t make sense to drive around in a 400 hp cars, with highly sophisticated electronics managing the ‘system’ to allow a ‘reasonable’ gas consumption, if a simple, 50 hp and environmentally friendly car could address our needs for a fraction of cost, little or no negative environmental impact, and so simple that can be repaired by our neighbor. It doesn’t make sense to produce non-recyclable packaging (acrylic plastic bottles, for instance), that have an environmental decomposition period of 10 years plus, if used for a product that is consumed in a minute.
3. Education is seen lagging behind; it’s often teaching for a world of yesterday’s technology and products. This has to change, too. Technology is also increasingly running away, and people have problems in mentally separating science from technology applications.
There is no doubt that reason, logical thinking, and modern education have solved many of our problems. Ratio has guided civilization out off the nightmares created by religious ignorance and emotional suppression. That’s why ratio, simplicity, science and technology need to be brought back to the people!
© 2007 by Franz L Kessler
2 Responses to “Progress - A Root Cause of Irrationalism?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /usr/home/web/users/a0028728/html/blog/wp-includes/functions-formatting.php on line 83
When I was a kid I didn’t know how to take a stereo or a car apart. But today I could build a computer. By that I mean, I can put the components together. Although, I needed to take a class to learn how, because I was tired of not knowing how to do it myself.
I had thought children learned all this in school, but none of my nephews know a thing about computers and always call me, 1000 miles away for assitance. LOL Apparently computer information is not a requirment for graduation, so I definitely agree with you, education is not teaching kids the skills they need to manage their future.
Now on your thoughts for a 50hp engine. Seems to me such an automobile would go very slow. It might be okay for inner cities, but for someone like me who drives hundreds of miles a week, would mean spending more time in my car and less time doing more important things. So I would qualify the use of such a low powered engine.
What of the invisible hand of supply and demand? Is it a blessing or a curse?
~ Sara
By the way, I forgot to mention earlier: I have a few shoe boxes filled with garbage computer parts, I cannot just throw away because of the toxic elements in them. On the other hand I have old PC’s I use to scavenge parts from. Then again, I also have several warehouse shelves filled with usuable machinery parts pulled off of equipment that reached a point where it wasn’t worth repairing. Sometimes there is a positive side to being a pack rat.
It is hard to imagine we could pollute ourselves out of existence, but another 1,000 years of this highly disposable mentality and who knows what problems we’ll be facing.
~ Sara
Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /usr/home/web/users/a0028728/html/blog/wp-includes/functions-formatting.php on line 83
Thanks Sara!
Hehe I’m not so bad on computers, too. If I get lost, I call my son Roland. Re old parts: There’s one chinese lady in Malaysia who recycles old computer equipment- there is hope on this front, I guess. 50 Hp cars? it wouldn’t work well with a steel body, though even classic designs get you to 80 miles/hour @ 50 hp @ 3 gallons of gas. For heavy cars, you need strong engines. I wonder if carbonfiber technology might help - my carbonfiber travel bag is extremely resilient against shock, yet only a fraction of weight compared to hard plastic ’samsonite’ ones. I could imagine that a lightweight car would also fulfill
your travel needs, even with a 50 HP engine. The weight-energy consumption ratio is indisputable - my motorbike uses 1 gallon of gas/100 km, the old 4WD 3.5 gallon diesel/100km. Often, we are just pushing tons of heavy steel weight around the globe, without us (the customer) really benefitting from it (George Bush & Saudis & fanatics do!).